Slow Query Proof Before Index Changes
A daily research protocol for turning a slow-query complaint into a proof packet before recommending a production index.
Short, evidence-backed research notes on slow-query proof, index safety, database agents, AI boundaries, burn-in testing, and production readiness. The daily cadence is for useful field notes, not filler.
Each cluster collects published notes and the upcoming editorial queue around one durable Postgres problem space.
Daily notes on pg_stat_statements, query fingerprints, EXPLAIN plans, workload evidence, and proof-backed diagnosis.
Research on index safety, HypoPG shadow planning, write amplification, lock posture, and rollback-ready recommendations.
Evidence standards for autonomous database agents, governed actions, action capsules, rollback contracts, and human approval.
Buyer-facing AI boundaries for Postgres products: prompt context, secrets, BYOK, private model options, and audit trails.
Burn-in testing, readiness gates, evidence freshness, restore drills, benchmark disclosures, and operational launch criteria.
QueryRook will publish daily when there is something specific to teach. Notes can be protocols, hypotheses, or field notes, but each one must say what it proves and what it does not.
A daily research protocol for turning a slow-query complaint into a proof packet before recommending a production index.
Why QueryRook treats pg_stat_statements as a safer first evidence source than raw query logs or copied application data.
A safe autonomous Postgres agent should prove how it backs out before it asks to change a production database.
A database agent should survive boring repeated work before it earns permission to touch serious Postgres environments.
The useful question is not whether AI helps with Postgres. It is what the AI can see, decide, and execute.
These queued topics are visible so the daily cadence is a product habit, not a last-minute content scramble.
Explain why concurrent index builds reduce blocking risk but still need lock, bloat, storage, and cancellation evidence.
Connect write-ahead log pressure to optimization safety and show why write-heavy systems need different proof.
Define the approval boundary between AI diagnosis, recommendation, dry-run evidence, and production mutation.
Show how small-sample query analysis should avoid overclaiming while still catching obvious plan regressions.
Introduce action capsules as bounded, signed units of database work that separate suggestion from execution.
Argue that autonomous change authority should wait for recent restore-drill evidence.
Describe a scoring model for prioritizing index candidates by observed workload and shadow-plan evidence.